case law on doctrine of ultra vires No Further a Mystery
As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been achieved, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read moreCase law is specific into the jurisdiction in which it had been rendered. As an example, a ruling within a California appellate court would not usually be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the discovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession from the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this aspect for interim custody of the subject premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
The lots of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made crystal clear that police is free to take action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities matter to regulation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. In the event the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-discipline duties in the interim period. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may perhaps seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Given that the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is achieved, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice from the Peace u/s read more 22-A is just not obliged to afford a chance of hearing for the accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to think about all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more
Because of this, just citing the case is more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Visualize it as calling an individual to tell them you’ve found their missing phone, then telling them you live in these-and-this sort of community, without actually offering them an address. Driving across the community looking to find their phone is likely being more frustrating than it’s value.
Case law, also used interchangeably with common law, is really a regulation that is based on precedents, that is definitely the judicial decisions from previous cases, somewhat than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case legislation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Concerning the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of your Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice just isn't served, the grievance petition might be dismissed. This is because service of the grievance notice can be a mandatory need in addition to a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation needs that a grievance notice be served on the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In the event the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) When the organization is transprovincial.
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The presence of this power casts an obligation around the police, and they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its various pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are necessary to protect instead of abduct. Read more
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability in the matter, but couldn't be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request on the appellate court.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are usually not binding, but might be used as persuasive authority, which is to offer substance on the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.